White House throws tantrums at Putin’s ironic comment about US elections

White House throws tantrums at Putin’s ironic comment about US elections

7
0
SHARE

White House throws tantrums at Putin’s ironic comment about US elections

Earlier the Russian leader said ironically that after incumbent US President Joe Biden “had been withdrawn” from the presidential race, Moscow came “to back” his successor Kamala Harris

The US administration seems to be quite irked by Russian President Vladimir Putin’s ironic comment about the presidential election in the United States.

The Russian leader had commented ironically that after incumbent US President Joe Biden “had been withdrawn” from the presidential race, Moscow came “to back” his successor Kamala Harris. “At the end of the day, the choice is up to the American people and we will respect it,” the Russian president added.

“The only people who should get to determine who the next president of the United States is the American people. And we would greatly appreciate it if Mr. Putin would, A, stop talking about our election and, B, stop interfering in it,” White House National Security Communications Advisor John Kirby has told reporters……Look who US talking. These same people never tire of lecture other countries on governance, democracy and elections. They keep talking of regime change etc !!!!!!! now USA gets offended when others talk about their form of democracy and elections.

The US will hold its presidential election on November 5. Current President Joe Biden was supposed to be the Democratic Party’s candidate but after his failed performance at a televised debate with Trump, calls among Democrats intensified for Biden to withdraw from the race. On July 21, he announced his decision to drop out and support Vice President Kamala Harris as the Democratic nominee for US president. Trump is the Republican presidential candidate in the election.

Russia has repeatedly denied any interference into political processes in the US, strongly rejecting these claims, and said it was not planning to intervene into US elections in the future.

Political interference is ….foreign ambassadors meeting leaders of political parties especially those from opposition prior to elections, having paid articles published in country’s leading newspapers on eve of election, propping up parties and candidates with foreign funds etc etc