A petition filed in SC by civil society activists, including Teesta Setalvad, asking the apex court to intervene in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid case.
Kapil Sibbal told the Supreme Court that all reports of the ASI have not been placed in court. A total Ayodhya dispute: Sibal told the three-judge bench of the Supreme Court that all these exhibits are not filled before this court.He submitted, all the pleadings are not complete, as reported by the news agency ANI.
Additional Solicitor General (ASG) Tushar Mehta, representing the State of Uttar Pradesh rebutted all the averments of Kapil Sibal. Mehta told SC that all the related documents and requisite translation copies are on record.
Sibal raised doubts over assertions of ASG Mehta that how come more than 19000 pages of documents can be filed in such short time.Sibal told SC he &other petitioners have not been served relevant documents of pleadings.
Shia Waqf board backs the construction of Ram Mandir in Ayodhya. The board said that they have no issues with the temple at the disputed site.
While the Sunni Waqf board has opposed to the same. Congress leader Kapil Sibbal appeared for the Sunni Waqf board in the apex court.
The hearing on the Ayodhya dispute case began in the apex court.
A three-judge bench has begun hearing the pleas by various parties involved in the case.
A day before the 25th anniversary of the demolition of the medieval-era-structure, the apex court is going to commence the final hearing today.
A special bench constituted of Chief Justice Dikap Misra and Justices Ashok Bhushan and Abdul Nazeer will be hearing the appeals, 13 in total, against the Allahabad High Court judgement of 2010.
The high court had then ruled a three-way division of the disputed 2.77 acre area at Ayodhya among the parties — the Sunni Waqf Board, the Nirmohi Akhara and the Lord Ram Lalla.
