China Resents Trump’s Offer For Mediation On Indo Chinese Stand Off
While Indian and Chinese forces have been engaging in a LAC standoff after China illegally further intruded across into Indian territory in the Galwan Valley region, which is reminiscent of the 2017 Doklam stalemate. US President Donald Trump could not help turning to Twitter, saying that his country is “ready, willing and able to mediate or arbitrate their now raging border dispute.”
It seems Trump correctly knew that though China and India, the two largest Asian powers, have their militaries facing each other on a Line of Actual Control, that they do not actually have a common international border. Early this year, A Very Stable Genius, a book written by two Washington Post journalists, revealed that Indian Prime Minister
Narendra Modi was shocked and concerned when Trump told him India and China did not share a border. This is totally incorrect. Modi is also very clear that India has a common border only with Tibet, which is presently occupied by China.
Further China is also in occupation of a chunk of Indian territory in Ladhak called Aksai chin. It is only because of these that Washington Post now claims that Chinese share a “ border” with India.
To what extent Trump’s personal Twitter account reflects the will of the White House remains to be seen. For the US, a conflicting China-India relationship serves its interests.
Washington rightly believes unless China is checked by India, the combined strength of Beijing and New Delhi could impair its interests in Asia and beyond. US therefore will always court India in an attempt to contain China.
The administration of former president Barack Obama repeatedly stated that it saw India as part of its rebalancing strategy aimed at China, and the Trump administration emphasizes India as a major pillar in its Indo-Pacific concept.
India has always known that the US can never be a reliable partner. “America First” policy endorsed by Trump cannot reconcile with Modi’s “Make in India” campaign,.No wonder a trade deal was elusive even during Trump’s high-profile visit to India in February 2020 because the two were locked in trade frictions.
” Last year, India turned down Trump’s offer to “help” and “mediate” between India and Pakistan over Kashmir, an issue India stressed can only be discussed bilaterally. India perhaps has been aware of the US’ bad history of mediation in which the US made troubles rather than solved problems, and which turned bilateral disputes into multilateral ones.
For instance, the US mediation in Japan-South Korea trade disputes and the Israel-Palestine conflicts have complicated the situations. Deaths and casualties from the two warring parties keep increasing.
When did the US start to behave like a peace envoy, especially under the current Trump administration? What it cares about is only its geopolitical interests.
China feels that they and India successfully solved their Doklam faceoff with concerted efforts and wisdom. The two informal summits between the leadership of the two sides, one in the Chinese city of Wuhan in 2018 and the other in the Indian city of Chennai in 2019, set the tone to maintain peace and tranquility along the border.
Indian experts also believe that the special representatives’ talks on the boundary question between India and China constitute an important channel of communication, and should continue in order to mitigate border standoffs and other hot issues.
The latest dispute can be solved bilaterally by China and India. The two countries should keep alert on the US, which exploits every chance to create waves that jeopardize regional peace and order.
