Indian Strike On Rouges And Terrorist Sympathizers At Geneva Based HRC
The current Special Rapporteurs on Extrajudicial Executions, Torture, and Right to Health — Agnes Callamard, Dainius Puras and Nils Melzer while referring to a June 2018 report of the Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights (OHCHR) wrote to the government in March 2019, asking about steps taken by New Delhi to address the alleged human rights violations listed in the report. These are the same chaps who are also trying to needle Myanmar on various imagined counts.
India reacted sharply to such crass nonsense from this Geneva-based Human Rights Council (HRC) on the imaginary violations in Jammu and Kashmir, India has informed the United Nations body that it will no longer entertain any communication with the HRC’s Special Rapporteurs on its report.
The Indian Permanent Mission to the United Nations in Geneva rejected all these nonsense replied to the OHCHR on April 23, saying that “India… does not intend to engage further with these mandate-holders or any other mandate-holders on the issue,” whom it accused of “individual prejudice”.
India had also rejected the OHCHR’s report on the ‘Situation of Human Rights in Kashmir’ — the first-ever such report on Jammu and Kashmir that came out in June 2018 — and accused the High Commissioner of Human Rights Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein of “clear bias” in bringing it out.
The report from the UN body came at the same time a report from two NGOs in the Kashmir part of State of J&K on the alleged cases of torture was released in Srinagar, which was endorsed by a former UN Special Rapporteur.
This so called UN report on Jammu and Kashmir coincided with the release of an extensive 560-page report on Monday, prepared by the J&K based Association of Parents of Disappeared Persons (APDP) and the J&K Coalition of Civil Society (JKCCS). The report, entitled ‘Torture: Indian State’s Instrument of Control in J&K’, documented 432 cases of suspected human rights violations and brutality by security forces of which only 27 had been investigated by the State Human Rights Commission.
The report claimed that nearly “70% of torture victims in Jammu and Kashmir were civilians (not militants) and 11% died during or as a result of torture”. The cases included incidents of electrocution, ‘water-boarding’ and sexual torture, which the government has repeatedly denied.
The mischief making intention of Mendez was clear when he said “This report will constitute a landmark. It is hoped it will be an example to other civil society organizations in India and in other countries as a model,” wrote Juan E. Mendez, former UN Special Rapporteur on Torture (2010-16), in the report’s preface, adding that he had been denied permission to visit India. In addition, the Special Rapporteurs had listed “13 cases of concern” from 2018 alone, in which “four children were among eight civilians killed by members of the security forces.”
When asked, the Ministry of External Affairs clarified that India’s stand on not engaging with the Special Rapporteurs was only for those wishing to refer to the OHCHR report.
However, UN officials say that India is already in contravention of several Conventions it has committed to, including a “Standing Invitation” signed in 2011 to all special rapporteurs to visit India.
According to the UN records, more than 20 such visit requests, including to Jammu and Kashmir, are pending at present. UN sources also said that between 2016-2018, the OHCHR Special Rapporteurs had sent as many as 58 communications, and had received no response other than the April 23 letter on Jammu and Kashmir.
Some years back India had similarly closed down the office of UN Military Monitoring Group in Kashmir, when it had become clear that their only aim was to favor Pakistan’s position.
J&K is an integral part of India and now we will not tolerate such interference from any one not even the UN.
