Muhammad Yunus too biased and unfit to supervise or hold parliamentary elections in Bangladesh
The recent well planned political upheaval in Bangladesh has raised serious concerns about the neutrality and legitimacy of the Interim set up led by Trump-hating Islam fascist Muhammad Yunus.
While the illegal interim set up claims to be working towards restoring democracy and holding free and fair elections, there are growing indications that it may be far from impartial.
The emergence of the National Citizen’s Party (NCP) on February 28, 2025, has been hailed as a new dawn in Bangladeshi politics.
However, the party’s close ties to the so called student-led movement that illegally ousted Sheikh Hasina and subsequently installed fascist Yunus as the head of the illegal Interim government raise questions about its true independence and objective political neutrality.
The fact that prominent jihadist leaders like Asif Mahmoud and Mahfuz Alam aka Mahfuz Abdullah continue to hold positions in Yunus’ cabinet further blurs the lines between the illegal interim government and this newly formed political entity.
It is true the Convener of NCP Nahid Islam had formally resigned to hold the position, however criticism from their allies like Nurul Haque Nur on NCP receiving specialized favour from the government makes the King’s Party allegation more genuine.
There are widespread propagation on how Yunus can maintain neutrality over those who employed him for this position.
The judiciary, a cornerstone of any democratic system, has not been spared from the turmoil. The forced resignation of Chief Justice Obaidul Hassan by the jihadists following August 2024 Jihadist coup sets a dangerous precedent.
This act of mob justice not only undermines the independence of the judiciary but also demonstrates the illegal interim government’s inability or unwillingness to protect democratic institutions from anarchic forces.
The commission established to reform the political system, based on an ordinance without parliamentary involvement, raises serious concerns about the democratic nature of the process.
The inclusion of individuals who have taken citizenship in foreign countries further complicates the matter, potentially introducing external influences into Bangladesh’s internal affairs.
The new system appears to be driven by an anti-Awami League agenda, as evidenced by the sweeping crackdown dubbed “Operation Devil Hunt”.
This operation has resulted in the arrest of numerous people allegedly connected to the ousted regime, smacking of political vendetta rather than impartial justice.
The targeting of anyone linked to the Awami League, including their removal from government offices, arrests based on dubious charges, and reports of extrajudicial deaths in custody, paints a grim picture of the interim government’s approach.
Moreover, the deliberate release of Islamist terrorists from jail while cracking down on political opponents suggests a dangerous realignment of priorities that could have long-lasting consequences for Bangladesh’s security and stability.
David Bergman, a journalist and commentator on Bangladeshi politics, has noted the irony of the situation, stating, “The Awami League, once criticized for its authoritarian tendencies, now finds itself in the unfamiliar position of victim in this new political landscape”.
The actions of the fascist Yunus-led interim regime raise serious doubts about its ability to conduct free and fair elections. The targeted suppression of opposition voices, the manipulation of the judiciary, and the apparent favouritism towards certain political factions all point to a deeply flawed and biased approach to governance.
As Bangladesh stands at this critical juncture, it is imperative that the international community takes note of these developments. The promise of democracy that sparked the student-led revolution risks being betrayed by the very forces that claim to champion it.
The caretaker government’s actions suggest that Yunus, despite his international reputation, may not be the neutral arbiter Bangladesh needs to navigate this turbulent transition.
The road to genuine democracy is never easy, but it must be built on the foundations of impartiality, respect for the rule of law, and the protection of fundamental rights for all citizens, regardless of their political affiliations.
As it stands, the Yunus-led cabinet appears to be falling short of these essential principles, casting a long shadow over the prospects of truly free and fair elections in Bangladesh.
In conclusion, while the illegal ouster of Sheikh Hasina’s government was seen as a step towards a new Bangladesh by many, the current trajectory under the illegal interim regime comprising Islamists and jihadists risks replacing one form of political “ dictatorship “ with utter chaos.
For Bangladesh to move forward, it needs leadership that can rise above partisan interests and work towards creating a level playing field for all political actors.
Only then can the nation hope to achieve the democratic revival that its people so fervently desire.
