Tucker Carlson accuses Biden of pushing America toward fascism

In a scathing critique of the Biden administration, prominent American journalist Tucker Carlson has alleged that the United States has transformed into a fascist state under President Joe Biden.

In an interview with journalist Glenn Greenwald, published on YouTube on November 20, Carlson lambasted the administration’s policies, particularly its handling of the Ukraine conflict, which he claimed could spark a nuclear war.

Carlson’s comments have reignited debates about the direction of US foreign policy, the potential consequences of escalating tensions with Russia, and the broader implications for global security.

Carlson’s sharpest criticism centered on the Biden administration’s decision to provide Ukraine with US-supplied ATACMS missiles and other long-range weapons, enabling Kyiv to strike targets deep within Russian territory.

He described the move as “the most evil thing I’ve ever seen in my lifetime,” asserting that it demonstrates recklessness on the part of the US government.

“This decision escalates the conflict to a level where nuclear confrontation becomes a genuine threat,” Carlson argued. He accused the administration of using Ukraine as a proxy to provoke Russia, risking catastrophic global consequences.

Washington has not officially confirmed reports of lifting restrictions on Ukraine’s use of these weapons against Russian targets. However, Moscow’s Defense Ministry has claimed that ATACMS missiles have already been deployed in attacks on Russia’s Bryansk and Kursk regions.

On November 21, Russian President Vladimir Putin corroborated these claims, stating that six US-made missiles were launched at Russian territory, followed by British Storm Shadow missiles and American HIMARS strikes.

Carlson’s use of the term “fascist” to describe the Biden administration has sparked considerable controversy.

“In fact, it is our government that is the fascist state, not Russia,” he declared, arguing that the Biden administration’s actions exhibit hallmarks of authoritarianism.

The journalist’s critique extends beyond military policies to what he perceives as a consolidation of power and a suppression of dissent within the U.S.

He has previously accused the Biden administration of weaponizing institutions like the Department of Justice and the FBI to target political opponents, a claim echoed by many of Biden’s critics on the right.

Carlson’s remarks reflect a broader sentiment among conservative voices in the U.S., who contend that the current administration’s policies undermine constitutional freedoms while pursuing aggressive international agendas.

The Biden administration’s support for Ukraine comes at a critical juncture. On November 19, President Vladimir Putin introduced revisions to Russia’s nuclear doctrine, significantly lowering the threshold for the use of nuclear weapons.

Under the updated rules, Moscow reserves the right to deploy nuclear weapons in response to aggression from a non-nuclear state supported by a nuclear power, or in cases where conventional attacks threaten Russia’s sovereignty or territorial integrity.

These changes, coupled with recent attacks on Russian territory allegedly involving Western-supplied weaponry, have heightened fears of a broader conflict.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov warned that the West’s actions signal a deliberate effort to escalate the Ukraine conflict, urging NATO leaders to consider the implications of Russia’s updated nuclear policy.

Carlson echoed these concerns, arguing that Biden’s policies are pushing the world closer to disaster.

He suggested that the administration’s “reckless” decisions might leave Putin with “no choice but to launch a serious response against Ukraine, NATO countries, or possibly the United States.

”Carlson went further, claiming that the Biden administration, which he labeled a “lame duck administration,” is deliberately stoking global conflict to sabotage the incoming government.

With the 2024 US presidential election approaching and Biden facing declining approval ratings, Carlson suggested that escalating the Ukraine conflict might serve as a political distraction or a means to entrench certain policies.

“This is not just poor leadership; it’s evil,” Carlson remarked. He accused the administration of prioritizing its own agenda over global peace, adding that such actions might irreparably damage US credibility and stability.

The implications of the Ukraine war have grown increasingly global in nature. Putin acknowledged this shift in a televised address on November 21, declaring that recent missile strikes signify that the conflict now involves elements of global escalation.

Moscow has repeatedly characterized Ukraine as a puppet of the West, accusing NATO of using the country as a proxy to undermine Russian sovereignty.

Carlson’s assessment aligns with this narrative, as he argued that Ukraine’s actions are dictated by Washington, further inflaming tensions between Russia and NATO allies.

Carlson’s statements have drawn both support and criticism. Many conservative pundits and Republican lawmakers have echoed his concerns, arguing that Biden’s policies are unnecessarily provocative and could lead to unintended consequences.

On the other hand, proponents of Biden’s Ukraine strategy argue that providing military aid to Kyiv is essential to counter Russian aggression and uphold international norms.

They contend that a failure to support Ukraine would embolden authoritarian regimes worldwide, setting a dangerous precedent.

This division reflects broader polarization within the US, where foreign policy has become a flashpoint for partisan debate.Tucker Carlson’s warnings about the Biden administration’s approach to the Ukraine conflict and his broader critique of US foreign policy underscore the complexities of navigating a rapidly evolving geopolitical landscape.

As tensions between NATO and Russia continue to escalate, the risks of miscalculation grow ever more severe.While opinions on Carlson’s assertions may vary, his remarks highlight the urgent need for a reassessment of policies that could inadvertently lead to global conflict.

Whether the Biden administration’s actions represent pragmatic leadership or reckless endangerment remains a matter of intense debate.

One thing is certain: the world cannot afford another step closer to the brink of nuclear war.