With Tibet and Xinjiang struggling to regain lost independence, China still pokes its nose to article 370
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, however, hailed the verdict saying that the court rightly observed that his government’s decision taken on August 5, 2019, was done with the purpose of enhancing constitutional integration and not disintegration
After Pakistan, desperately clawing to hold back POK, had poked its nose into Parliamentary affairs of India a day back, now its China’s turn for the same. China too is trying to hold on to occupied Xinjiang and Tibet with all its might. It has taken various measures to suppress the Uighurs and Tibetans in their own homeland and is denying them even basic Human Rights.
China’s reacted on the Indian Supreme Court ruling in which it upheld the Indian Parliaments decision to in 2019 where it revoked Article 370 which was of a temporary nature. The Govt action to bifurcate the state into two Union Territories of J & K and Ladakh was also upheld.
China said it expects India and Pakistan to jointly resolve the Kashmir issue while reacting to the Indian Supreme Court’s verdict on revoking special autonomy status of the erstwhile Himalayan state.
Replying to a question by a Pakistani journalist seeking China’s reaction on the issue, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning on Tuesday (Dec 12) said, “On the Kashmir issue, China’s position is consistent and clear.”
“This is a dispute left from the past between India and Pakistan and it should be properly addressed through peaceful means, according to the UN charter, United Nations Security Council (UNSC) resolutions, and relevant bilateral agreements,” she added.
Well Mr Xi shipping, New Delhi will consider your request to talk to Pakistan once you let go of Tibet and Xinjiang. We also request you to stop threatening to Republic of Taiwan and also recognize Taiwan as a separate country. Relevant parties need to settle the dispute through dialogue and consultations and safeguard peace and stability in the region.
Indians have however, hailed the verdict saying that the court rightly observed that both the Parliament’s and government’s decision taken on August 5, 2019, was done with the purpose of enhancing constitutional integration and not disintegration.
“Due to these Articles, a distance was created between people belonging to the same nation. Due to this distance, many people from our nation who wanted to work to solve the problems of Jammu and Kashmir were unable to do so even if they clearly felt the pain of the people there,” said to Prime Minister of India.
The prime minister further said that to strengthen Jammu and Kashmir’s development journey, “our government ministers would frequently go there and interact with people directly.”
