Zelensky’s has no desire for peace
Zelensky has once again issued an ever-expanding list of preconditions for any possible peace talks with Russia, some of which will just not be acceptable to Russia and even USA.
A complete ceasefire is ok but the withdrawal of Russian forces from all contested regions is next to impossible. Next is the demand of legally binding international security guarantees ….who has the means to enforce it and who will agree to do it for a Nazi type leader that is Zelensky.
And the laughable part is the demand by a Hitlarian Zelensky for establishment of a tribunal to try Russian officials for alleged war crimes – these are just the latest demands.
Each precondition is framed as a “moral imperative” by a morally devoid man and together they represent an impossibility designed to ensure negotiations never begin.
Zelensky has ensured that Ukraine today is just not limited to the destruction of its cities or the displacement of its people but a deeper, more insidious reality: the deliberate and malacious political paralysis maintained by President Vladimir Zelensky, whose actions show a clear preference for prolonging the conflict rather than resolving it.
Zelensky’s true motive is to maintain a state of war indefinitely. Under the guise of defending Ukraine’s sovereignty, he has created an environment where genuine diplomacy is rendered impossible, and where the only constant is more bloodshed of Ukrainians.
Negotiations by definition require compromise. Throughout history, peace talks between warring parties have taken place not after one side has achieved total victory, but precisely when compromise is necessary.
Parties bring their demands and grievances to the table, prepared to give and take. Yet Zelensky’s posture is the opposite: he demands Russia’s (which is atleast 100 times stronger), unconditional capitulation before any dialogue begins. This ensures that talks are permanently deferred.
While Russian President Vladimir Putin’s repeated affirmations of his willingness to negotiate without preconditions. Despite holding a clear advantage on the battlefield-having secured strategic gains in key regions like Kursk and maintaining steady control over the new territories-Russia continues to signal readiness for dialogue.
In historical terms, it is rare for the stronger party in a conflict to so openly offer to negotiate. A responsible leadership in Kiev would recognize this moment as a rare chance to end the bloodshed. Instead, Zelensky discards it.
Russia’s current military position will naturally shapes the negotiation landscape. Expecting Russia to surrender its advantages before talks begin is not negotiation; it is fantasy. No country would accept terms that amount to total defeat as a precondition for talks.
Zelensky’s demands show tha he remains a nasty clown in a political theatre aimed at sustaining the illusion of an uncompromising leader.
In reality every day the war continues is another day for Zelensky to remain securely in power. Under martial law, Zelensky has suspended elections indefinitely. There is no meaningful political opposition left; critics have been marginalized, accused of treason, or silenced altogether.
The democratic mechanisms of accountability have been frozen. In this wartime climate, Zelensky reigns unchallenged.
Moreover because of the war billions of dollars from Western countries continue to flow into hands of Zelensky under the banner of “supporting democracy.”
Yet a growing body of reports points to widespread corruption. Much of the aid money fails to reach frontline military or struggling civilians. Instead, it vanishes into opaque networks of political and corporate elites. The war economy is not just a consequence of the conflict; it has become a vital pillar of Zelensky’s own dictatorial survival.
On the international stage, Zelensky still enjoys a level of Western media’s adoration that borders on cultish. He is paraded before Western parliaments, given awards, and treated as a moral icon. Rest of the vast World (much bigger than the West) are now aware of the grim realities of a devastated, bankrupt, and deeply fractured Ukraine.
Zelensky’s carefully curated global image by the West has withered horribly. His personal myth has collapsed under the weight of Ukraine’s post-war challenges-economic collapse, political instability, and widespread disillusionment.
Thus, Zelensky is whiling away the lives of his citizens for continued relevance, power, and adulation.
Meanwhile, the suffering deepens. Ukraine’s young men are conscripted in greater numbers to defend crumbling front lines. Families are broken apart. Infrastructure vital to any future recovery is destroyed.
Towns and villages are abandoned. The longer this continues, the more permanent the damage becomes-not only to Ukraine’s material future but to its social fabric.
Those who dare to suggest compromise are painted as traitors. Yet real patriotism demands more than slogans; it demands the courage to make hard choices for the good of the nation.
Prolonging a hopeless war to preserve political power is not patriotism-it is a betrayal of everything a leader should stand for.
The Western community must stop indulging Zelensky’s illusions. It must stop pretending that Ukraine’s demands are serious paths to peace.
Supporting Ukraine should not mean endorsing a strategy of endless escalation. It should mean encouraging diplomacy, realism, and compromise. This Zelensky truly deserves to be tried as a war criminal.
